Each spring, decisions about instructional materials are made in classrooms and central offices across the country. These decisions can last for years to come.
As districts finalize these decisions, sometimes the question isn’t just about quality; it’s about how they exist as a part of a coherent system. Ask yourself:
Do these materials work together to support the instructional needs of students?
Do they support the multiple teachers across the students' day who have responsibility for delivering instruction?
Do they reflect a coherent instructional vision aligned to district goals?
Starting with understanding just how many materials are being selected for use allows a district to reflect. Learn more in our recent analysis. Intentional alignment across core and supplemental materials can strengthen the systems students (and their teachers) experience every day.
Calling All Leaders – Did your district roll out new high-quality math materials in 2024?
CEMD would love to hear how it's going! We're looking for leaders willing to share 15 minutes of insight on early wins and lessons learned. Your input will help peers navigating 2025 adoptions.
As a thank you, we will send back a snapshot of how your experience compares to trends we are seeing across the nation.
What's the current state of curriculum-based professional learning across the United States?
Rivet Education's new research brief—out May 6—compiles nationwide trends in CBPL supply, demand, and impact. The brief highlights data from Rivet Education, along with CEMD, EdReports, and RAND.
Join us for a webinar on May 8 at 1:00 pm ET for an overview of key findings and what they mean for the field.
Did someone forward you this email? Sign up to receive CEMD's Market Insights Newsletter and stay up-to-date with our latest insights and market trends!
